インタビューの記事と質問です
記事
「We ware the pioneneers of the space era.
You had to read Aviation Week to find out what't you'd done.」
質問
Which of these options best explains the meaning of the quote?
a. If you read the journal Aviation Week you could find out more about the future of space travel.
b. Johnson wrote articles for Aviation Week about her work for NASA.
c. Johnson and her colleagues didn’t always realise exactly what they were working on until later
答えは C なのですが、なぜCなのか、いまいちわかりません。
教えていただけますか。
回答
記事の引用の内容が、私たちは space ear の pioneers 的存在だったので、何をするべきかについて Aviation Week を読んで確認するような状況だった。ということを言っています。
Aは Aviation Week を読めば space travel の未来についてもっとわかるようになる。
Bは Johnson が NASAでの彼女の偉業について Aviation Week に記事を投稿した。
Cは Johnson と彼女の同僚たちは後になるまで自分達が何に取り組むべきか常にわかっていたわけではなかった。
ということですので、内容としてCがふさわしいことがわかります。
This is not a piece of advice to you I'm talking to myself for my practice of writing skills. when you would like to ask some questions on this Question Box about English I suppose that it would be important to give reference of the quoted if possible. the quoted reference would make the intention of the question specifically/expressly. more over in some cases some hints about the question could be found there. in the case there's not any reference, because of the meaning of the question might be ambiguous so sometimes this would make people to hesitate to answer the question. some of the questions would be like as that showing only one photo and ask what they're doing in a photo.in rare case which can determine the scene may be. in many cases before and after the scene cut away might arouse various meaning to the scene. these cases might be obscure/vague. and it would be useful for you to sleep on a question over one night, you would find some hint/revision/complement in some cases. the deeper the question the deeper the answer. if you would've posted the question please continue to think about the question it'd be useful for your progress to compare your thought with the answer.