英文を和訳してください。よろしくお願いします。
The pattern of variation seems no different than for any other skill,so what causes people to react so strongly when the skill is making money? I believe there are three reasons ; the misleading model of wealth we learn as children ; the disreputable way in which , till recently. most fortunes were accmulated; and the worry that great variations in income are unhealthy for socciety. As far as I can tell ,the first is mistaken,the second outside , and the third empirically false. Could it be that , in a modern democracy, variation in income is actually a sign of health?
回答
個人差があるのは他のどんな能力にしたって同じなのに、お金を稼ぐ能力の個人差のことになると人々がこうもひどく気にするのはなぜであろうか。それには3つの理由があると考える。1つ目は我々が幼少期に、富に関する誤解を生むような考え方を学ぶから。2つ目は近年までの富の築かれ方は多くの場合、褒められたものではないから。3つ目は所得格差が大きいことは社会にとって良くない、と人々が懸念するから。私の知る限り、1つ目は間違っていて、2つ目は…であり、3つ目は経験則上正しくない。もしかすると、現代の民主主義社会では、所得格差は実は正常さの証なのではないだろうか。
長文なので多少大まかに訳してあります。ご了承ください。また、3文目の the second outside の付近で言葉が抜けているようなのでご確認ください。
この質問に回答する
The pattern of variation seems no different than for any other skill,so what causes people to react so strongly when the skill is making money? I believe there are three reasons ; the misleading model of wealth we learn as children ; the disreputable way in which , till recently. most fortunes were accmulated; and the worry that great variations in income are unhealthy for socciety. As far as I can tell ,the first is mistaken,the second outside , and the third empirically false. Could it be that , in a modern democracy, variation in income is actually a sign of health?